Is it pathetic and sad that, whenever these posts feature covers with mostly-naked girls on 'em, I pick which one I like better solely based on which version of the chick I think is hotter?? Um, never mind, rhetorical question. Anyway, I prefer the original one. Chicks in glasses? Hawt. ;)
Time for a shameless plug...I've started a companion blog to Covered called REPANELED (Artists copy COMICS PANELS). Check it out if you want to:http://repaneled.blogspot.com/Thanks to Rob for the inspiration!
J. Astro - There isn't a chick wearing glasses in either cover.
There is a dude wearing glasses!
hahahahaha - ah, yes *blushes* the chick on the right has the $2.50 label over her eyes and my dumb brain read that as "glasses, but upon enlarging, I'm not sure how I misread that. *skulks off, shouts back over shoulder - I still like her better, though!!*
Hey, you're sneaking a little Jim Woodring into this one, aren't you, Sneaky Guy?
Who is the artist? The artist depicted.
No one specific...an amalgamation of Silverlake hipster dress and stuff.Like what would a hipster be into now as opposed to 1990? Skinny women, macbooks, tampons on cel-phones, parliaments, pabst blue ribbon, ipods, american apparel, tim biskup, beards, skinny jeans....hats....etc...
Just amazing. Gorgeous colouring and sinuous linework.